I am super excited about the movie adaptation of Lional Shrivers Book "We need to talk about Kevin."
I first heard about the book when Radio 4 abridged it as their "book at bedtime". The resigned tones of the reader had me hooked with horror and I actually went out and bought the book first hand (a biggie for me, I'm a 2nd hand junkie.)
Readers seem to be split into two camps so far as Shrivers protagonist, Eva, is concerned. There are those who dismiss her as cold, un loving, selfish and then there are those (myself included) who see a portion of themselves, magnified, in her.
There are few parents who haven't had a child in their care who, for a few hours, (or days, or weeks) has seemed like an alien creature, a being we can't make happy or content or even understand in the tiniest way.
The runaway train feeling of losing control is perfect in the book.
You know whats going to happen, but the momentum carries you faster and faster until you just have to grip tight and make it till the end, with still a few gasp inducing revelations to kick you in the last few pages.
So you can understand my anxiety, even while excited, at seeing this book in movie form.
The book works on a letters format, Eva writing down their life to her husband, Franklin, trying to work out on paper where it went wrong with raising Kevin, their life, their family.
I'm curious to see how much the story changes by not having that voice, by making the story so much more visual than narrative.
Its very rare that I find a movie of a book I love that I also love.
Maybe that says more about the books I read than the movie makers.
Recently I watched Peter Jackson's adaptation of "The Lovely Bones", A book, in my opinion, which showed a fresh perspective on the well trod "child murder" path. I loved the dreamy feeling of the book inter cut with the harsher reality of a family trying to cope with the aftermath.
Disappointingly though I felt the movie was rushed, running through the whole story in a matter of weeks rather than the years in which the novel passed.
Key moments were lost because of this and I was left with a feeling of irritation that what could have been a great movie was rendered almost impotent.
As I love movies as much as books, this anomaly always irks me.
My own feeling is that a full length novel rarely makes for a good movie.
Movie makers want your bum on a seat for a little over 90 minutes, but to shoot a whole book, would mean a good five or six hours of viewing!
The best adaptations I've seen have been based on short stories or novellas.
Think "The Shawshank redemption" or "Brokeback Mountain", both amazing heartfelt movies, both shot almost scene for scene, word for word, both less than around 40'000 words.
A style of novel suited to movie adaptation would have little dialogue and lots of description. A camera can pan across a landscape or a room in a few minutes and show you what it took the author ten pages to describe.
Anyway here are a few movies I thought worked beautifully on the big screen ..... and some that really really didn't.
The Good
One: Brokeback Mountain. Written by Annie Proulx (From the book of short stories Close Range:Wyoming stories)
Two: The Shawshank Redemtion. From The Stephen King book of novellas Different Seasons.
Three: A Clockwork Orange. Stanley Kubrick's adaptation of Anthony Burgess's ground breaking short novel.
The Bad
Blade Runner: Beloved by many as a great movie, Ridly Scotts adaptation was so loosely based on the Phillip K Dick novel that it bore little relation to it at all. Left me cold.
Two: Jurassic Park. So disappointed when I watched the movie, the book was richer and changing key characters is always shifts the balance of the original story.
Three: Rinu (Ring). Now I LIKED the movie, mainly because the Japanese get how to make a scary film, but after reading the book I was disappointed. Key character changes and a more shallow telling of the book meant that they missed out on a more seminal and possibly scarier movie.
The Ugly
The Stand. Stephen Kings epic novel turned into a few hours of disjointed pap. Such a shame.
So.
Agree? Disagree? Have anything to add?
Hit the comments button, don't be shy.